Credit: © The Royal Society
Image number: RS.10478
Looking for a special gift? Buy a print of this image.
The 'fieldfare of Carolina' and the snake-root of Virginia
Date
1731
Creator
Mark Catesby (1683 - 1749, British) , Naturalist
Object type
Library reference
18894
Material
Technique
Dimensions
height (print): 265mm
width (print): 350mm
width (print): 350mm
Subject
Content object
Description
A deceased ‘Turdus pilaris’, the fieldfare of Carolina, laid on a stump of ‘Aristolochia pistolochia seu serpentaria virginiana cale nodoso’, the snake-root of Virginia (Catesby’s identifications; modern scientific names: Turdus migratorius, the American robin; Aristolochia serpentaria, the Virginia snakeroot or Virginia dutchmanspipe).
Plate 29 from volume I of The natural history of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands, by Mark Catesby (London, 1731).
Mark Catesby was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1733.
Plate 29 from volume I of The natural history of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands, by Mark Catesby (London, 1731).
Mark Catesby was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1733.
Object history
The Natural History was originally published in 10 parts, intended to be bound in 2 volumes. It was the earliest western scientific description of the flora and fauna of North America, and its copper plates were etched and hand-coloured by Catesby himself.
Catesby’s trips to North America were funded by a group of sponsors, many of were colonial governors, charged with managing the British Empire’s territories, and their support of Catesby’s research can be read as an exercise in colonial control. As The Natural History’s parts were issued it also became important as a reference text to naturalists attempting to order the natural world according to the ambitious taxonomic systems that characterized the mid-18th century.
Catesby’s trips to North America were funded by a group of sponsors, many of were colonial governors, charged with managing the British Empire’s territories, and their support of Catesby’s research can be read as an exercise in colonial control. As The Natural History’s parts were issued it also became important as a reference text to naturalists attempting to order the natural world according to the ambitious taxonomic systems that characterized the mid-18th century.
Associated place